When talking about static types you can't just take the union of all the best features in all type systems. Like if one gives you A but not B and another B but not A, you can't say static typing gives you A and B. You're going to write your code in just one of them!
-
-
...since the comments couldn't possibly make sense if someone had read the paper. Maybe this is an unusual example because it's a paper, but I don't think that it's *all* that different when the link is a blog post and not a paper?
-
Have you seen this before? https://www.npr.org/2014/04/01/297690717/why-doesnt-america-read-anymore … Sadly they got rid of the comments section so it loses a bit of its oomph
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In principle, this tells us nothing about what percentage of people are reading carefully, but my immediate reaction was "Dan won that disagreement": https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=throwaway023421 …".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.