When talking about static types you can't just take the union of all the best features in all type systems. Like if one gives you A but not B and another B but not A, you can't say static typing gives you A and B. You're going to write your code in just one of them!
-
-
But for posts like PG's recent post or other widely read thought leader-y posts, comments actually seem better? What can you say to "haters are generally losers"? The posts are basically a series of rorschach tests, people can pick out any phrase and respond with their feelings.
-
But when people respond in the same way to a post by Jeff Kauffman, it's very obvious that the comment is a poor quality comment by someone who didn't read the post. Maybe this is too facile? But I think it explains why some bloggers I read get so many obviously bad comments?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.