I suppose I could try to do a comparison by (for example) sending some known high-quality audio into the input and seeing what kind of quality I get out, if there's no difference between audio quality from a high-quality source vs. my laptop mic then I shouldn't expect much.
The reason I think there's noise is the change should only impact one computer, so half the pipeline, but the latency is cut in half? There's no way adding the camera reduced the latency on one host to zero. Maybe I'm not thinking about this correctly, but this seems odd to me.
-
-
I mean, if noise dominates the measurement, then it probably can't hurt too much to use an external camera, but I'd be curious what the average difference is and how much is just random noise.
-
Wait, it's not impossible that halving the latency is real, the image isn't round tripped through both cams and both displays. The entire pipeline should be: http://A.cam -> A.mac.input -> http://A.to.B.network -> B.mac.output -> B.display ->
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are measuring one cycle of this right? I don't think it needs a round trip and it looks to me like any part of it could dominatepic.twitter.com/Rql3aamI1T
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.