SCIENCE GANG FIGHT I've pretty closely read both papers from a conf talk on empirical engineering, and now I gotta read the rebuttal super closely, toohttps://twitter.com/vlfilkov/status/1196714347403202560 …
-
-
When I reviewed empirical PL papers, almost all had methodological problems or studied something meaningless, but this was the only paper that convinced me that the authors were less knowledgable on the subject than typical HN commenters.
-
That's brutal
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This was a major issue you might not have seen yet, from the replication (The rebuttal claims that most of the false positives were true positives, but I haven't gone through that yet)pic.twitter.com/FuI353Nela
-
Okay I just looked up their claims about "most false positives are true positives" and it turns out they read the wrong file
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What is wrong with the statement in the screenshot? Isn’t that something proponents of dynamic typing indeed sometimes argue?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.