You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Given it is hard to measure costs and near impossible to quantify benefits, it would be nice if major tech companies were significantly different so we could at least compare macro outcomes. Instead there is surprising amounts of groupthink.
One thing I find funny about programming is the slow diffusion of practices. Fuzzing/randomized testing has been standard practice in hardware for my entire life and there are papers applying this to software that are decades old, I that doubt even 5% of devs use fuzzing today.
This no different from other fields, but we have this rhetoric around how well reasoned our practices are. But if that's true, why does it take decades for best practices to diffuse, just like every other field where practices are culturally inherited and obviously unoptimized?
Yes. Even stranger that code reviews went from rare to ubiquitous over the last 20 years with no evidence, when fuzzing did not despite tons of evidence.
Could it be that ~95% of devs today are using memory-safe languages? I like fuzzing, but it takes some rearchitecture to set up for, and I don't know that I'd believe it's worth it for something like JS, Java, Rust, or even Golang.
I don't see why fuzzing or randomized testing should only be used for memory-unsafe languages? The vast majority of bugs I've found with these techniques aren't memory safety bugs.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
