AFAIK some of the more complex ARM cores use uOPs however the decode pipeline is far less complicated (I don’t know the ins and outs of arm though so better double check me)
I mean, for any particular market, someone will have to produce a chip that's not garbage technically, but whether or not that happens is really a business question and not a technical question, IMO. And whether or not that thing sells is also a business question.
-
-
Do you see RISC-V having any particular technical advantages over ARM, in terms of being a more power efficient or flexible architecture to develop against, given the choice?
-
I haven't looked into this enough to have an opinion, although unlike the other question, I could imagine having an informed opinion on this someday :-).
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.