Since 2016, I've been thinking about how clear, informative, non-academic talks don't seem very popular.
In 2016, @garybernhardt gave a talk on reproducibility at StrangeLoop which I thought was quite good. It clearly explained a non-obvious idea and came in well under time.
-
Show this thread
-
Literally everyone I talked to at the conference gave the talk a lukewarm to negative review. One person even walked out. The reason everyone told me that talk was lame was that it was so obvious there was no point in giving a talk on the idea.
2 replies 0 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
This is interesting because a couple years earlier, I saw a talked that covered the same topic, wildly popular (most YT viewed talked from the conference of all time) but incomprehensible. I didn't even know what the talk was about until I saw Gary's talk 2 years later.
1 reply 1 retweet 22 likesShow this thread -
After watching the wildly popular talk, I asked about twenty people at the conference if they could explain what the talk was about and how the 2nd half related to the 1st half. Literally zero people told me they thought they understood the talk.
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likesShow this thread -
I kept asking about the popular talk for about a year and eventually found one person who said they understood the talk, but after talking to them at length, they couldn't explain the talk. This talk was widely loved and is still highly cited today.
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
Gary's talk was so good, so clear, that everyone I talked to thought the talk was bad. If there was more vague ranting or talking around the point instead of actually conveying the point, I suspect people would've liked the talk.
6 replies 9 retweets 78 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @danluu
I think there are a lot of factors here, most reflect poorly on the audience. But to try and understand them for a moment: humans like stories. Some kind of narritive structure, a complication and a resolution.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @davidcrawshaw @danluu
It's possible you already had a story going in your head when you saw the talk. "Reproducibility is a problem, e.g..., I'm stumped, what's the solution?" then talk you saw resolved the story you were working on.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @davidcrawshaw @danluu
Other audience members may have only heard the ending "Romeo and Juliet are in love and both die" and from that one line synopsis conclude the play is boring.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It's entirely possible that I mainly liked the talk because I'd seen another, well regarded, talk on a related topic that didn't make sense to basically anyone I polled, despite spending a year polling people. Hard to tell what I would've thought without seeing the other talk.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.