You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
People love talking about network effects and winner-take-all/most markets in tech, but of course a side effect of that is, if you're dominating such a market, you can make a massive number of bad decisions and still own the market for quite some time.
This is the kind of thing I think of when people say you should do X because some company does X It's become trendy to say that you shouldn't do X because you don't have the same scale, but I think this misses the more common reason you shouldn't copy another company's decisionpic.twitter.com/HR7gg8yy9s
Likely, the decision ultimately came down to connections, not technical "merit". Even if you have the same scale or are even literally the same company, copying the outcome is nonsensical because the decision making process doesn't make sense out of the context of trading favors.
There are a lot of infamous stories about this kind of thing (e.g., re-writing a working chat app on top of the wrong database so that it could no longer reliably send messages), but the thing I think is often missed is that "good" decisions are often made for similar reasons.
Like when there are two competing proposals, both eminently reasonable, and some VP has to decide which one to pick. They don't have the time to really evaluate the proposals (no one does), so they pick the person they trust. Why should anyone copy the outcome of this process?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
