One issue (IMO) is there are people who are legitimate experts on some topics who seem compelled to write up reasonable sounding but completely bogus comments on other topics. Unless you're a subject-matter expert, I think it would be hard to determine which comments are bogus.
-
-
The obviously completely wrong comments don't bother me (everyone can tell those are wrong), but a pet peeve of mine are the people who are credible who feel like they have to comment on everything. There are three or four people like this. Why!? It's a waste of everyone's time.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
When they comment on topics I know about, the comments are very wrong (but not obviously so to a lay person). I'm guessing they're no different on topics I don't know about outside of their expertise. This is one of the two main reasons I don't read a lot of HN comments anymore.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Definitely. The same suspects turn up on regular expression threads and talk about regular expression derivatives *every* *single* *time*. They don't have experience building this stuff, but they've read a couple papers or blog posts and just want to show that off.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @geofflangdale @pkhuong and
I'd love a forum where experts deleted bogus comments, like r/askhistorians but for tech. One funny side effect of that moderation policy is, if you visit a popular discussion a week or two afterwards, 80% to 100% of comments will be deleted.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @danluu @geofflangdale and
That's a teeny bit like how stackexchange works, although the connection is fairly weak: "experts" are identified by enough points in the relevant categories, and the abilities conferred by more points don't directly include deleting answers, but do include locking questions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @trav_downs @geofflangdale and
I find it surprising how good "technical" Twitter is for this. I think the SNR is maybe 1:2 to 1:10 for questions I ask here. Terrible in an absolute sense, but extraordinarily good relative to other forums I know of (including mid-sized private forums).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @danluu @trav_downs and
The one thing I can think of that positively contributes is the combination of muting plus threading, which makes it easy to permanently mute people who inject noise into conversations without disrupting your own conversation with un-muted people.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @danluu @trav_downs and
But basically every other aspect of Twitter's design that I can think of makes it bad for high SNR discussion. Is this really the best thing going outside of small email threads with 5-6 people? That seems implausible.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @danluu @trav_downs and
Semi-public slack or discord chats seem to be popular in certain fields. Never joined any tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Maybe I'm on the wrong ones, but I haven't seen one where (IMO) good technical discussion lasts for more than a few years. Over time, people who inject noise into discussions get invited and they drive out people who post responses that I'd like to read.
-
-
It’s a hard problem. There are people at RWT I often want to kick out, but they sometimes start very productive discussions. Sometimes community contribution isn’t obvious.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.