don't know about only one. evo-psych is a very active field but they spent more time on the evo than the psych, as a rule. Peterson is fairly uncommon in having more emphasis on the psych while also caring a lot about the evo.
-
-
-
a big problem is trying to account for evolution on short time frames, when there's no readily discernible fossil record or other material traces. something BIG happened fairly recently but why? why did symbolic thought structures (evidenced in e.g. cave art) emerge?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.