Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell is a fantastic depiction of magic. I tried to read the book when it came out (would've been fourteen or fifteen) but it was extremely difficult and I forgot most of it.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @theheathenjohn
it's really great. magic as an engineering discipline. if you actually go out and do shit, it might work. it's utterly impotent as a theoretical discipline though. there just is no correct theory of magic. that's not the kind of thing it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @danlistensto
the byronic strange vs the dickensian norrell is such a gorgeous contrast and the way the various players move so gracefully around the stage is just so flawless, i adore this kind of thing
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @theheathenjohn
the utter alienness of the fae-folk as well. their amorality and totally inhuman experience of time and space.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @danlistensto
the prominence of mirrors and reflections as magical apparatus is great! also love the sharp books/no books divide between our two leads.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @danlistensto
yes, and the comparison of strange to merlin was not lost on me. i've not seen a lot of john dee in it so far but the use of magic in statecraft is playing in a similar space i think.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
John Dee's absence in the book is a kind of remarkable omission since it's about English magic specifically. In their timeline it seems like the Raven King might have been the only game in town during the Elizabethan era?
-
-
Replying to @danlistensto
kind of hilarious that that is the most truly alt-history thing about it lmao
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.