Thing is, clarity is a spectrum. And the ideal level varies both by context and personal opinion.https://twitter.com/unlearningecon/status/998548940848017408 …
make better criticisms then. yours is weak and bashing a strawman.
-
-
yes, the straw man of actual quotes and diagrams from Peterson which make no sense
-
the diagram is explained. you just admitted that you refuse to listen to the explanation. you desire to criticize a diagram out of its context. that's the definition of a straw man. make better criticisms.
-
my claim is that Peterson's communication is muddled and unclear. That his diagram would require two hours of explanation is not inconsistent with that
-
how many hours of explanation does it take to explain this diagram?pic.twitter.com/KgGpM3hC5y
-
funny, I'm reading a book on quantum mechanics and it takes them a page at most
-
after you've acquired several years worth of math and physics as background, sure. You don't think, maybe, you're looking at something you don't have requisite background in?
-
last time I studied physics was 10 years ago, whereas I deal with philosophical stuff every day. Therefore I'm much less confident in understanding quantum physicists than I am philsophy
-
let's just cut to the end. you've got a political dispute with Peterson which is why you want to criticize him. you don't care much about the academic subject matter, do you? don't suppose you've spent a lot of energy criticizing any other psychologists.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.