Thing is, clarity is a spectrum. And the ideal level varies both by context and personal opinion.https://twitter.com/unlearningecon/status/998548940848017408 …
-
-
Replying to @everytstudies
any spectrum which measures babbling about dragons as 'clear' is not worth the scale it's written on
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @UnlearningEcon @everytstudies
What's unclear about it? It's a reference to common symbology in multiple creation myths.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @everytstudies
this springs to mindpic.twitter.com/MJH9oT9aMa
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UnlearningEcon @everytstudies
that's a diagram that would be presented in the context of a 2 hour long lecture where the entities and relationships expressed graphically would be explained verbally. if you take anything non-obvious out of context then it will seem confusing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @everytstudies
yes - I too need 2 hours to explain my nonsensical diagrams. Besides, everything he says in here is at this level: https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve … obviously it is our job to wade through all of the 'context' to get at whatever he's saying
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UnlearningEcon @everytstudies
you're unremittingly hostile (I checked your feed) so it's not really in either of our interests to continue here. If you don't feel like listening to him, that's totally fine, nobody is requiring you too. If you want to criticize though, it makes sense to listen first.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
if you have 10 minutes to spare though this is a reasonable description of Peterson's major themeshttps://www.weeklystandard.com/tanner-greer/jordan-peterson-saves-the-world …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.