Thing is, clarity is a spectrum. And the ideal level varies both by context and personal opinion.https://twitter.com/unlearningecon/status/998548940848017408 …
you're unremittingly hostile (I checked your feed) so it's not really in either of our interests to continue here. If you don't feel like listening to him, that's totally fine, nobody is requiring you too. If you want to criticize though, it makes sense to listen first.
-
-
as a public intellectual he puts things into the public sphere (which I have looked at) and will rightly receive criticism for them, especially when they are nonsensical or even actively harmful. It is his job to convince me it's worth going deeper into his work, but he hasn't
-
make better criticisms then. yours is weak and bashing a strawman.
-
yes, the straw man of actual quotes and diagrams from Peterson which make no sense
-
the diagram is explained. you just admitted that you refuse to listen to the explanation. you desire to criticize a diagram out of its context. that's the definition of a straw man. make better criticisms.
-
my claim is that Peterson's communication is muddled and unclear. That his diagram would require two hours of explanation is not inconsistent with that
-
how many hours of explanation does it take to explain this diagram?pic.twitter.com/KgGpM3hC5y
-
funny, I'm reading a book on quantum mechanics and it takes them a page at most
-
after you've acquired several years worth of math and physics as background, sure. You don't think, maybe, you're looking at something you don't have requisite background in?
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
if you have 10 minutes to spare though this is a reasonable description of Peterson's major themeshttps://www.weeklystandard.com/tanner-greer/jordan-peterson-saves-the-world …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.