Here is an interesting question. Imagine humans divided into a three part spectrum: 1) People who are nice enough that upon interacting with them you say, "wow, what a nice person.” 2) People who are tolerable. 3) People who are bad enough that you would call them an a-hole. 1/
-
Show this thread
-
If you had to guess, based on your total life experience, what ratio, regarding humanity as a whole, would you say accurately describes the relative percentage of each in the population? (This is a spectrum, so obviously there’ll be a lot of edge cases. Just ballpark it.) 2/2
5 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Just to be clear, this is not about any individual, including the reader. This is about everybody. If you knew everybody in the world well enough to say, what do you think the ratio would be? 33/34/33? 1/99/1? 10/40/50? I am interested in your opinion.
9 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
-
Replying to @danlistensto @legalinspire
but a lot of "tolerable" people upgrade to nice when you get know them better!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @danlistensto
A person who is nice to you because they know you, but is not nice to other people because they don't, is not a nice person.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @legalinspire
I agree but not what I had in mind. Was thinking of a person who is not initially nice to you, because fear/doubt/distrust, but when you get to know each other better becomes much nicer. I guess you would consider that not nice. I don't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I guess I'm not nice.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.