Add "among parrots" to the end of every sentence. When looking at distribution of mating success among parrots (Robin Hanson analyzing incel problem), it is fairly easy to keep reading without bursting into laughter. Not so with "social hegomonies" and some invisible power fabric
isn't it just subtextual? it's not like these guys were secretive about their politics in priorities outside of their actual publications.
-
-
I agree that everyone knew what Foucault’s politics were, but I’d love to see an essay by Foucault trying to explain why “social hegemony” is intrinsically bad, for example.
-
This. A million times this. He claims to not be doing anything normative and just analyzing society, but he's clearly rendering moral judgments left and right. Yet he's methodologically committed to neither making them explicit or justifying them. It's all dark imprecation.
-
adaptive camouflage defense. use only insinuation and subtext to make your arguments so any refutation can be answered with "but I never even said that" even though everybody knows he said that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
in
.