My criticism of them isn't that they are nice/mean, they are just plain wrong once you understand the Talebean perspective on risk. Pinker is actually too nice. I find him hypocritical for being for free speech, but never actually saying anything risky or offensive.
-
-
Replying to @MimeticValue @Plinz and
he's said plenty of risky/controversial things lately. insofar as it's become controversial to pro-actively defend Western enlightenment (i.e. science and reason and secularism and liberalism) in left-wing academic settings in this current political clusterfuck.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @MimeticValue and
he's also argued against the "blank slate" view of mind (he has a whole book about this topic called The Blank Slate) which is a very controversial topic. it seems uncontroversial to us, perhaps, because it's just obvious that biology influences behavior. but there it is.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @MimeticValue and
Taleb has a lot of great insights too but I think there's a trap there. He's got a great framework for coming up with risk management positions in high uncertainty environments. He's not an endless font of wisdom though. His paleo-conservatism gets in the way a lot.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @Plinz and
I don't see paleoconservativism in him. And I don't see what he's getting in the way of.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MimeticValue @Plinz and
you don't? his constant obsession on ancient religion, "Mediterranean" identity, genealogy, traditionalism, and basing his ethics on a mixture of classical stoicism and "tough guy" macho bullshit?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @Plinz and
That's a shallow interpretation. Essentially what he's really describing in these things you mentioned above is the history of multilevel selection. You have to offend some open to rip apart the modern myth of universalism.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MimeticValue @Plinz and
I think his posturing gets in the way of developing compassion, which is a much better basis of an ethical system than anything Taleb is talking about.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @danlistensto @Plinz and
Bravado is indistinguishable from compassion in vajrayana. You gotta be macho to take on the suffering of others and dissolve them into emptiness as a Bodhisattva.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MimeticValue @Plinz and
Avolokiteshvara is androgynous and Guan Yin is feminine
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I'm not meaning to say that the iconography is necessarily authoritative or that there's any "one true path". just that what you've said is at odds with traditional representations.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.