Very interesting read. Its unusual, biologically-aware leftist anti-corporate sort-of-conservatism is a refreshing and remarkably coherent refactoring.https://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2018/03/31/big-reputation-the-mark-of-the-beast-macho-subordinacy-and-the-masculine-fourth-turning/ …
I enjoyed the article as well and agree that it defies conventional categorization or labeling. I'm tempted to call it leftist neo-reaction though.
-
-
Neoreactionaries are quite fond of power concentrations though, iirc.
-
well, this is why I'm distinguishing between right wing NRx (basically monarchists) and left wing NRx (radically decentralized governance) I found the content and style of the critiques to be deeply similar with a lot of right wing NRx stuff though.
-
Then what do they actually have in common?
-
a certain kind of "flavor" of the writing and thinking style. strong emphasis on analyzing implicit power structures and class structures within society. a rejection of the established order but lacking a clearly defined new program. criticism in particular of bourgeois norms.
-
Hm ok, but that's a pretty wide net.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.