I'm getting the feeling I need to read Jordan Peterson just to find out what all the commotion is about.
the Sam Harris interview is not a good example of the man's work. it was mostly an example of poor communication where the two of them couldn't decide what they wanted to really talk about so argued stupidly for an hour.
-
-
I disagree with you that Peterson has retreated back to stage 4 though. I think Harris is stuck there and that's one of the reasons Peterson had trouble talking to him about "truth". Sam's stage 4 strict rationalist empiricism vs. Peterson's stage 5 contextual symbolic truth.
-
That makes sense, in that throwing stage 5 type thought into public discourse ought to lead to chaos and a whole lot of rorsaching.
-
yeah, it's hard to communicate even to receptive audiences let alone trying to do it in public with detractors interjecting
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.