-
-
He is, however, a tradcon and that's a huge turn off for many. I hold my nose and put up with it because I feel like it's important to understand what the man is actually saying. I dislike the aesthetics too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But didn't he come to prominence because of thw whole pronoun kerfuffle?
-
Yes, and? His objection was to a law that could be interpreted as criminalizing mundane speech acts.
-
I owe you a more in depth response when I have a few more minutes available.
-
I'll be honest, I sat on the fence for a long time w/ Peterson but I saw him doing some Kekistan song and dance on Twitter and immediately lost all interest.
-
Plus I'm not really in the market for that kind of figure at this stage in my life. Rogan did the job pretty well for several years, along with Duncan Trussell, Daniele Bolelli and Ari Shaffir to varying degrees.
-
alright, a few minutes available now. You asked if Peterson ought to be considered exclusionary and pointed to his opposition to bill C-16 as evidence of that. I think that's worth addressing.
-
The specific objections to that bill was that it was 1) legally ambiguous and 2) could be interpreted in such a way that mundane speech acts could be considered human rights violations, which carries a VERY stiff legal penalty.
-
there is a conflict of values involved here and I want to discuss that separately only after I discuss whether or not Peterson's position ought to be interpreted as exclusionary
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.