The best way to encourage more risk-taking is to make it less risky. (Incoherent? Yes. But not any more wrong than the notion that innovation-based entrepreneurship depends essentially on "risk taking") What it depends on is people with good ideas being able to execute on them.
-
-
You've maintained the incoherence (which I consider a plus, because it highlights the flaw in conventional thinking). If you've reduced the consequences of failure, you've made it less risky.
-
There might be a distinction between market risk and personal risk in the neighborhood that could resolve the incoherence.
-
helpful to split risk in a few different conceptual categories. personal vs. market is a useful split. so is distinguishing between opportunity cost and sunk capital cost.
-
I've read it a few places (probably Tyler Cowen blog among others) and I tend to agree that one of the structural elements that has made the U.S. a very wealthy place is good bankruptcy laws. They're less punitive than most countries.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.