Hypothesis: Being different isn't always a competitive advantage, but you have to be different to have a competitive advantage. Discuss?
-
-
elaborate?
-
as a toy example, assume two workers that are internally identical, suppose they're literally mechanical automatons built to the same specs, etc. each worker is now placed in a different environment. the ONLY differences b/t them are exogenous in this example
-
the first worker has a constant, uninterrupted power supply. the second worker has an unreliable power supply, goes down several times per day for significant periods of time. worker 1 obviously has a huge competitive advantage due to external factors alone.
-
gotcha, that makes sense
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.