The fundamental philosophical question today is: "How best to describe the relationship between Humanity and Technology?"pic.twitter.com/oOEJI2xAcJ
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Yeah, that's what I wanted to indicate with User-Tool. This is most generally accepted view. And while the accelerationist crowd thinks it's naive, most people would find accelerationist ideas to be delusional.
we can reverse that POV and say that machines are in the driver's seat and they augment their contextualizing and meaning-making powers with humans.
we're already at full integration, is my point. it doesn't have to be surgically implanted. we have NO capacity to live absent our machine prosthetics. if we don't have them we just immediately invent them, starting with the first one: language.
I totally agree on our integration with technology, but it's the other side of the relationship I'm skeptical about. Just how dependent are machines on humanity? Less and less, every day.
open question. I have yet to see an AI that has a useful level of meaning-making capability though. there are some people who think it's inevitable that an AGI will emerge and will be truly post-human. I doubt that will occur.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.