Has there been any thinking on “project-based equity”? Ie splitting recurring revenue from indiv projects based on contributions
it can be but that requires a very optimistic view of how a central distribution authority will behave
-
-
I've struggled to create small systems that keep these things in check, and have err'd to both sides, and seen how they actually fail.
-
I'd be really interested to read your thoughts on that (failure modes) at length
-
my intuition is that centralized systems deal with coordination scaling problems but fail at fairness/liveness and autonomy of subsystems
-
and that decentralized systems deal with fairness and autonomy well but choke on their poorly scaling coordination costs
-
Sounds generally right on to me. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Too much centralization and every node in the network is trying to reflect the main node. Not enough difference there...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too much decentralization and a system deflates, or becomes recentralized around whoever/whatever steps into the power vacuum.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The key point, that I'm still wrestling with, is what conditions give rise to truly distributed systems (like the internet).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.