Has there been any thinking on “project-based equity”? Ie splitting recurring revenue from indiv projects based on contributions
I think the misconception is that holacracy is uniformly flat, which it is not necessarily. It's more about decentralization than flatness.
-
-
Decentralizing is one way to move toward a distributed system. Centralizing can also be a way to move toward a distributed system.
-
it can be but that requires a very optimistic view of how a central distribution authority will behave
-
I've struggled to create small systems that keep these things in check, and have err'd to both sides, and seen how they actually fail.
-
I'd be really interested to read your thoughts on that (failure modes) at length
-
my intuition is that centralized systems deal with coordination scaling problems but fail at fairness/liveness and autonomy of subsystems
-
and that decentralized systems deal with fairness and autonomy well but choke on their poorly scaling coordination costs
-
Sounds generally right on to me. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I've learned a lot recently about the structure and nature of networks in the "Networkologies" book. And also from
@fortelabs posts. :)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IMO, It's actually more about distribution than decentralization.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.