Politicians have little accountability beyond "public opinion" and "peer opinion", both of which, being human, are easy to game. https://twitter.com/ClarkHat/status/925774636046082054 …
No snark intended. What does that actually mean?
-
-
I was trying to make a "Like Distributed Trust, But For Brands" joke but I guess it fell flat.
-
I guess I need to step up my meme game.
-
or step it down. Political block-chain is interesting and figuring out applications is good brain food.
-
Blockchain Trust is Mechanical Trust. It is underwritten by Human Trust in experts, networks, science, repeatability.
-
Political Trust is a direct application of Human Trust. It cannot be mechanized (like a ledger) until we have fully mechanized The Human.
-
Confusion between trust as measure of mechanical vs human authenticity makes the idea of a Political Blockchain absurd & plausibly humorous.
-
money as token stand-in for trust/status in human relationships. blockchain tokens as domain specific money. I don't think its absurd.
-
Trust is multifaceted, implicit, and time-varying. It cannot be easily computed, and even if it could, it cannot be easily transacted.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.