can you elaborate on that? I think there is a nontrivial cost to overreaching CoC statements that, eg, explicitly state that they'll only punish certain kinds of racism, but I'm not sure how this case would qualify.
different ones and more manageable imo and ime. the main risk in an org without a codified CoC is that two parties in conflict might disagree about appropriate redress after the fact. a CoC forces them to agree before the fact, or exit the org.
-
-
but I think disagreements of that kind are readily solvable on a case-by-case basis via arbitration and negotiation. that seems easier and more elegant than a formal CoC, and has less collateral damage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.