-
-
Replying to @PereGrimmer
can you explain this a little? the claim here is that Ford's attorneys misinformed her such that she felt obligated to appear in Washington instead of offering written testimony in California? Do I have that right?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @danlistensto
That seems to be the upshot of the Tweet-storm. I have not reviewed the complaint. They're saying that, if Ford's testimony was accurate, her attorney(s) breached their ethical duty to keep Ford informed of material developments & allow her to direct the case.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PereGrimmer @danlistensto
Uh oh. Does this put her at risk of perjury?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @katabaser @danlistensto
That's the trap; either she perjured herself or her lawyers committed an ethical beach.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PereGrimmer @katabaser
I don't understand how she would have perjured herself (assuming her testimony itself was not false witness). What difference does it make where she testified and what her state of knowledge re: her options were? Am I missing something?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes I assume that is what you were referring to but I'm probably less familiar with relevant details than you are. Was hoping you could inform me. What might she have lied about?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.