Typically it doesn't get "thrown up" directly, but resolved dialectically. Every compelling idea has a reason for appeal. If you drink the kool-aid and reflect, you can determine what those reasons are, and then you can take a more informed stance.
-
-
we need market economics because we need the wealth they produce. that's non-negotiable. I consider inequality to be a natural consequence of markets that amounts to a type of social pollution that we are obligated to clean up for the good of our social environment.
-
this amounts to having basic bitch welfare capitalist policy preferences, but I think it's the most morally tenable position out there currently while we work on surviving long enough to not kill the planet and reach post-scarcity economics
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.