Typically it doesn't get "thrown up" directly, but resolved dialectically. Every compelling idea has a reason for appeal. If you drink the kool-aid and reflect, you can determine what those reasons are, and then you can take a more informed stance.
-
-
Replying to @simpolism @MimeticValue and
The evidence throughout history is all over the place: people agreeing in parts and disagreeing in other parts, then writing critiques where they attempt a synthesis.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Are we talking about "the far right" as a movement or are we talking about
@0x49fa98?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Heh, I feel like "mysticism+biology+literature+mathematics" (well, perhaps sans "biology") could be compelling used as a description of what makes Judaism compelling too.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simpolism @MimeticValue and
I don't think you could ever get the guy to identify as a card-carrying leftist, but I'm sure you could find areas where their beliefs overlap, and where they want the same sorts of outcomes.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
you're both right, and that's why there's a problem. neither the state nor the market ought to be powerful enough to determine who lives and dies without any other recourse.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
the deepest ideological flaw in 0HP's thinking is that he is an essentialist w.r.t the value of people and takes it as reasonable to assume that a person who has struggled thus far in life is doomed to always struggle in life. that's demonstrably wrong in a billion ways.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.