plants are sentient (they feel, they react to their environment) and have readily observable behavior that we would call "intelligent". they also communicate with each other. eating plants means maiming or killing sentient, intelligent beings. we are animals, this is our naturehttps://twitter.com/crawland1000/status/1040344247977865219 …
-
-
I do not think plants have a subjective experience in the sense that I possess one, which has nothing to do with judgment or premeditation
-
I also don't think that my roomba has a subjective experience, although it clearly perceives
-
I do think your roomba has a subjective experience, albeit a very limited and primitive one. it is sentient (barely) but not sapient.
-
I am extremely dubious of ~epiphenomenal subjectivity
-
why? how else would you define it?
-
the subjectivity* I experience is significantly causally linked to the world (e.g. I can tweet about it). and it makes sense that this sort of experience would only arise because affects fitness. *normally I just use "sentience" to mean the concept I am referring to here
-
the sensations that arise within a roomba are significantly causally linked to the world too. it has sensors and it makes decisions based on the facts about the world reported by those sensors. is this different than how you do it? how is being able to tweet about it relevant?
-
remember the distinction between sentience and sapience. your reflection, introspection, and conceptual model of yourself are attributes of sapient cognition. sentience is just the fact of having feelings and sensations. subjectivity is a first consequence of having sensations.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.