I'm focusing on the degree of comfort or discomfort our society feels in performing actions against pre-natal vs. post-natal humans. I probably shouldn't have used the abortion issue because it's so wrapped up in its own debate that it's just obscuring this topic.
you're still not understanding what I was attempting to clarify. you're focused on the question of "does a fetus/convict deserve to be killed?" but I'm not attempting to address that question.
-
-
-
we're trying to reason about the preferences of society for either acting or choosing not to act upon a pre-natal human. this question isn't limited only to terminating a fetus or gene-hacking a fetus for intelligence. any pre-natal intervention is subject to similar questions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.