got a link? my thoughts on Chapo are that they're just 30 something lefty versions of Rush Limbaugh. like Rush, they have been pushed by their audience towards ever more fringe extreme positions. they're competing for the fringes now.
-
-
...causes here. There's no single thing, but rather a confluence of corruption and mismanagement that led to the starvation conditions. The most characteristic type of corruption was misreporting of expected output capability in order to curry favor with party bosses...
-
...which combined with centralized allocation of projected harvests led to situations where provinces that were starving had all of their food confiscated because the planning committee had decided to do that 18 months previously based on unrealistic estimates due to corruption.
-
nobody intervened to say "the people are starving we need this food" because the local party bosses would have to admit they had lied, and they would have been EXECUTED for making that admission.
-
anyway, not intending to recount a minor bit of history research I did years ago. just saying, Chapo bro here is clearly making shit up to fit a narrative. he doesn't know the history. it's obvious.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
the most damning thing about the forms of Communism that emerged in the 20th century is that they seemed designed to elevate the most incompetent into leadership roles. this isn't strictly speaking a problem with Marxist economic doctrine. It's an implementation problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.