Seems obvious that this hiring process is just about finding particularly exploitable workers. A very strongly implied "would you go insane working ridiculous overtime hours?"https://twitter.com/isthisthais/status/1020007666683281408 …
the purpose of an interview is not only to convince a company to hire you, but to learn for yourself if you want to work at the company. I really don't see what the objection is. I don't code in my spare time. I found a company that doesn't expect that of me.
-
-
There are ethical ways to communicate such information. Asking candidates misleading or obfuscating questions is not one. Anyway, let's not continue this conversation. IME, this is a very difficult topic cross-culturally, for all sorts of reasons. I don't feel excited abt. it.
-
It's difficult enough for me to explain to e.g. my wife that she doesn't have to lowball her salary negotiations when she's qualified. And that's just the *praxis*. When you get into ethics it's a whole 'nother quagmire.
-
last word, since you don't want to continue: interviewing and selecting a workplace is a skill and it's a shame people are not as savvy about it as they ought to be. business is not a 100% honest and ethical endeavor and treating it as such leads to disappointment.
-
Fair enough. But now you said smth. interesting. I never said you need to be a dupe. My entire point: if you know you're being treated unethically, feel free to let the gloves come off. I don't answer unfair questions the same way I answer fair questions. Why would I?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.