Lmao (& also, thread.) https://twitter.com/MikeRoach3/status/1015235089540829185 …
-
-
I would love to read some counterpoint to all this, but everything I've seen makes me think this is just another thing like battleships or cavalry charges where institutional inertia rules until some actual peer-competitor war shows how wrong everyone's assumptions were
-
it is a multi-role fighter with a design that would naturally sacrifice performance in specific domains for overall versatility and as to close engagements i believe the intention is that those will be long over before it ever gets into the battlespace
-
this seems like a great example of just straight-up taunting fate re: Murphy's Law
-
oh and it can engage loads of targets simultaneously without human intervention
-
in theory it sounds really good but then you remember that these claims are being made about something that fails when evaluated via several really basic metrics, by said thing's manufacturer(s). IDK.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.