you can cut the world into an arbitrary number of dualistic oppositions and learn nothing new from it except that language is a sword.
-
-
I don't think the distinction between infinity and "really really big" is fatal to dan's point
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I would expect an infinite number of overlapping divisions as well as an infinite number of non-overlapping divisions. which ones you call up is dependent on which words you use to call them with.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
they aren't equally meaningless though. just that the language you use to frame meaning is part of the frame itself.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
maybe. I'm definitely making a pretty strong (controversial perhaps) claim though it is fairly consistent with many systems of non-dual philosophy. I'm tweeting so trying to work with the limits of the medium but maybe it's not serving me well here.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.