that seems mostly right (heh) to me. there are some positions that transparently cause so much gratuitous suffering or have such a bad historical track record that we can comfortably categorize them as "wrong" without much subtlety. most policies and beliefs are not like that.
-
-
The idea that some views can be wrong is just a premise of the tweet. He's clearly not making any general prescriptions about what is or is not wrong. If you accept the premise that there are some views that are "wrong," then there's nothing to quibble about with the tweet.
-
the premise isn't "it's possible for a view to be wrong". the premise is "no conservative Supreme Court nominee can possibly hold right views regardless of the gender of the nominee" and I object to that premise because no specific nominee has been named.
-
How is that the premise of that one sentence? You're adding all sorts of additional context. Where is all the coming from?
-
did you actually read the tweet and the quoted tweet it is responding to? I feel like the context here is incredibly obvious and you ignored it.
-
And I think your assuming all of it. Regardless, it's an objection to a completely different argument than the one literally stated. Focus, people
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
clear enough? holy shit dude
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.