Some responses to this exemplify a particular disagreement pattern I've been trying to articulate for some time. Someone complains about open disdain for white men, to which someone else responds, sarcastically, that white men "have it so tough" or something to that effect. ->https://twitter.com/sullydish/status/1012711850788753409 …
does it require a metaphysical grounding? basic primate reciprocity is good enough reason.
-
-
Reciprocity might imply it's a good idea (i.e. strategic by default) to be respectful. But not that we deserve it.
-
We start out deserving it for the same reason the tit-for-tat strategy begins with cooperation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nominally. How has this worked out? http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ … (different use-cases, so I'm mostly being antagonizing. But I think pessimism is warranted.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.