A Question for my Twitter Sangha: is Non-Dualism the same as the doctrine of Emptiness? My experience with Dzogchen and Tibetan Buddhism confused the two (either they confused them or I did), but now I'm starting to see them as very different doctrines. What's your take on it?
I don't have a good reconciliation of this with Emptiness. I've possibly misunderstood it or possibly it's meant to be far more domain limited of a claim. Best I've got is to note that we can imagine a front without a back. We do this all the time in mathematics, for example.
-
-
So Emptiness is really a characteristic of thought and consciousness rather than a metaphysical or ontological claim about existing things. But then, do thoughts exist? I want to say they do. What is the complement of a thought though? Emptiness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.