his response to a different author who is the probably the original source where this person got the mischaracterization fromhttps://jordanbpeterson.com/uncategorized/response-to-vox-feminist-philosopher-dr-kate-manne-of-cornell/ …
-
-
In the linked thread an argument is made that she's not nearly anonymized enough and that ppl who know her could identify her from that excerpt. I'm not sure if that's the case but, eg, SSC definitely anonymizes case studies way more thoroughly
-
possibly the case. that's a substantively different criticism than what has been made though. I understand the politics around this leads to hyperbole (and lying) so it's expected, but I have a strong preference for limiting criticisms to the most salient points.
-
Oh totally, but right now I'm sort of assuming this is going to be more "he technically didn't say the thing, he merely heavily implied it" and not "claims he said the thing are a complete fabrication"
-
if we believe his account in the blogpost (I do, but also would love to see the primary text) then he says that he didn't say much of anything directly to the client/patient and just listened while trying to avoid priming her response. so his accusers look like liars to me.
-
maybe I'm misunderstanding your perspective? I don't want to do that. To me it looks like a deliberate malicious misreading that explicitly omits important context.
-
I'd say that's at least 50% likely but there's just not sufficient info to say w/o the primary source
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.