I'm trying to think of how to respond to that idea "political valence is built-in" and struggling to know how to phrase my objection. I need to take a step back from the current round of the culture war and collect my thoughts on this further I guess.
the former case is boring. too obvious that it would be widely accepted. how about the latter case. that's a eugenics program that could make treated people no longer have offspring that are vulnerable to the most common types of heritable cancers. how would that be accepted?
-
-
Now, a gene therapy for poverty, that would be something. This is SF premise land. One story I read had good dystopic educated elite/flyover masses setting, and then nanotech weapon is repurposed to make everyone photosynthesize. Basic minimum calories anyway.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.