Western liberal ideology is ‘appealing’ in the way that, say, Cartesian dualism is appealing: ‘a picture held us captive’. We struggle to find another way of seeing things. Even critics blindly accept its assumptions.
I don't understand. What's appealing about Cartesian dualism?
-
-
The second 'appealing' should've been in scare quotes too. I'm saying liberal ideology isn't actually appealing, it's just a set of difficult-to-resist philosophical confusions.
-
right, I understood the subtext. I continue to be confused that there was any point in time where Cartesian dualism seemed appealing to anyone, even in the sneer quoted sense of appealing (a trick, a glamour). It seems obviously wrong and harmful to me and always has.
-
liberal ideology seems to do a better job (to my mind anyway, with all its quirks) of casting an effective glamour. it takes work to see through it and I still find a strong desire arising to salvage the parts of it worth salvaging.
-
Right, but the whole of philosophy of mind is basically an attempt to wrestle with Cartesian dualism, even though most people today signal against it. I probably could've found a better example though.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.