the precautionary principle should't be taken to mean "don't do this it might be bad/scary/evil" but rather "let's do this, but like, stand behind a blast shield just in case"
I still don't know how this ties back in to sex robots though? isn't that what we were originally talking about?
-
-
the cosmo article has precautionist argument structure, just written by someone who likely does not know the term "precautionary principle"
-
Cosmo has the business model of making women feel bad about every possible thing in their life. They will in the same issue unironically denounce sex robots and also sex with men and also not having sex with men and also sex with women and also not having sex with women.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.