“Philosophy...might fancy itself a model of precision & finely honed distinctions, but what it really loves are polarisations & dichotomies”
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Embarrassingly out-dated article attacking views (evil robots, really?) no serious people hold.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting but "No conscious, intelligent entity is going to emerge from a Turing Machine" begs the question "Human" - "Turing Machine" = ?
-
Human - Turing Machine = Human Nature? And I don't think our hormones elevate us. They rather hold us down.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There were some good points in there, but computational limits of Turing machines do _not_ exclude AI
-
As far as we know, human brains obey the same computational constraints and yet we are intelligent beings
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is what some in the field would call a "strawman"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The singularity doesn't have to be concoius. What if the singularity more simply can optimize and reconfigure itself "without the lights on
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“We should make AI do... ,” is where this article, and this line of thinking lose the plot. We will not *make AGI do anything
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a really dumb article.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.