Guns are highly dangerous but I can’t shake off the angle that “we’d be holding millions of responsible people accountable to the mentally ill”.
these are good points; don't let folks forget them. Guns Aren’t a Bulwark Against Tyranny. The Rule of Law Is.https://nyti.ms/2yJNx9y
-
-
-
I don't see what the problem with that is. It's applied anywhere else, such as cars, flying, fire codes...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Shrink gun ownership rights to minimum. Well armed militia can’t be regulated; unregulated militia is recipe for tyranny, not liberty!
-
Who do you think’s going to do the confiscating? After all, you’ll be criminalizing 50-80 million gun owners unwilling to forfeit property.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And who holds the law accountable? Every tyrant establishes laws to constrain the governed.
-
And who decides if the govt is tyrannical? Some random asshole with a chip on his shoulder? That’s the very definition of terrorism
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If Congress believed in the Rule of Law they would not exempt themselves from most of them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Funny, insurgents with less firepower then the American people held their own in Iraq and Afghanistan. 1/2pic.twitter.com/w8CaMHOSBJ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The rule of law is Tyranny.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right. If we get to the point where we need guns to fight off the government, we've pretty much lost already.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.