A direct piece, and how. It paints a dark and bleak picture of the immediate road ahead. Will they pull upon the knot they have tied?
Take this VERY seriously. it is clear-eyed and realistic.http://www.38north.org/2017/09/jdethomas092517/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not the same issue we’ve been arguing about, but the same risk-balancing situation...but we’re both on the “things are really bad” side here
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...and also quite bleak
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No sir, have to say, i'm just not convinced (in a Henry Fonda, 12 angry men sort of way). There is every chance this is brinkmanship, Cuba,
-
Brinkmanship only works if there is a credible threat. Saying it's onky brinkmanship is saying it's onky a loaded gun, it has not fired.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If NK lauches a first strike, the US will turn the it into a wasteland and I don't see China having any good reason to aide NK-Regime.
-
China has more reasons to stay out of such a conflict than throwing their weight behind a madman and risk political and economical ruin.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I liked the article - very thought provoking. But not convincing on all points. In particular, it ignores China's role in this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If people don't stop these idiots, they will start the unthinkable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.