also if they have reason to doubt his sanity
Do the generals realize that their duty to obey the CommanderinChief lapses if they have reason to believe he is not well informed? Be brave
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not quite, they can only disobey an order that violates law, not one that 'may' be, or even knowingly is, misinformed.
-
Unless generals are held to a different legal standard than enlisted folk, I'm confident this is correct.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Mutiny implies criminality. A constitutional, or in other words, a legal action cannot also be criminal, or in other words, illegal.
-
Justified disobedience seems more appropriate than mutiny.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If the order violates the constitution military officers have a duty to disobey.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Read the oath taken by all US Naval officers. They swear to uphold constitution not to obey the orders od the Pres. This is by design.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.