@danieldennett It would be about time.
Such a good idea, and so clearly argued! An atheist justice!http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/put-an-atheist-on-the-supreme-court …
-
-
-
@MartijnTonies@danieldennett If you want to play tokenism,then a Native, LGBT or physically challenged person would be more appropriate. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@danieldennett quick question, what force of nature made the sun and moon appear the same size from earth? -
@Jon__Stone@danieldennett Force of deception ie not taking distance into account. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@danieldennett@LKrauss1 Yes, but dime-store b/c exponential complexity has blown up efficacy of r cultural genome? http://ow.ly/YvOvqThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@danieldennett@NewYorker Nobody argues about the religion of politicans or judges here in Germany. Please join us in the 21st century. -
@RenH93
@danieldennett@NewYorker It's the same in Cda.Yanks seem to want to make atheism another religion.If you're secular,it's irrelevant
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@danieldennett Well said: appointment of a secular judge is the best way of ensuring religious freedom while upholding non-religious valuesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@danieldennett yeah & see justice done the right way, bloody separation of church & state, what a joke America, in god we trust? nick offThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@danieldennett Why?Simply being an atheist does not grant one wisdom or sensibility.Qualifications should count more,if u want 2 be secularThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.