Did I have a choice in leaving this comment? ;)
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So is deterministic chaos inaccessibly deterministic? i.e. so complex as to be unmeasurable and/or incomputable.
-
Seems to be of the incomputable variety, yes. I think that's Dan's stance but I'm not 100%. I don't blame the writer for having trouble with Dan's version of this. I still don't see where the free-will "compatibilism" pops out from, and I've been reading this stuff for decades.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
‘Random’ but determined is a tough one for some people to grasp; ‘god does not play dice’.
-
There is no need to grasp it: you could never falsify a claim that something is either random or determined. How would you know? Philosophy has created this problem by creating these appealing but irrelevant concepts in the first place.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree that chaos is what ultimately gives the illusion of free will, but it's still fundamentally unfree.
-
Is any claim that there is a difference falsifiable? Then there really *isn't* a difference... it's an ill-posed question.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
more on Free Will, Libet paragidm, stochastic models for Readiness-Potentials by Adina Roskieshttps://twitter.com/_mxochicale/status/1322191493361225728 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
haha I hear that AARGH in my ear
#classicdandennettThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.