Assuming nature does not make jumps, now, sensory experiences (consciousness) are neither illusion or brain's story for itself, but do belong to the essence of a every cell? Problem solved?
-
-
-
What you call 'intentional stance' is what a single cell is specialized to or tasked to do smth, IMO.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
agent as a term implies consciousness. surely there is a better way to characterize this process.
-
And it's phenomenal consciousness.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting and worthwhile. Thank you for the link.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Looks very interesting, thank you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A nested hierarchy of agency. This is the idea Freud and Jung struggled their entire lives to articulate (unconscious drives and the collective unconscious, respectively). This idea is also implicit in Panksepp’s categorical model of emotional affect.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Natural intelligence has long been at work, in so many spieces of life. The behavior exhibited by natural animals including human animals, is unmistakably brimful of evidence of intelligent organisms at work. Open your eyes! It all happens physically, electromagnetically, FYI.
-
Frankly, there are few examples of what can be deemed unintelligent behavior, in genera, in the so-called Animal Kindom of Nature. Life is inherently intelligent in the critical sense that all organisms process information. Phyisical intelligence evolved, i.e in terms of brains.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
For one horrible moment I thought DD might be slithering towards panpsychism...
-
What’s the functional difference between panpsychism and eliminativism?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.